
Qini Curve and AUUC for Uplift / Policy Evaluation
qini_curve.RdComputes and plots the Qini curve and Area Under the Uplift Curve (AUUC), which measure the quality of treatment effect heterogeneity estimates for targeting / policy evaluation. Compares a CATE-based targeting rule against random assignment and perfect targeting benchmarks.
Usage
qini_curve(
cate_hat,
Y,
W,
compare_random = TRUE,
compare_oracle = FALSE,
n_bins = 100,
conf_level = 0.95,
boot_reps = 500,
seed = 42
)Arguments
- cate_hat
Numeric vector of estimated CATEs.
- Y
Numeric vector. Observed outcomes.
- W
Numeric vector. Binary treatment assignment (0 or 1).
- compare_random
Logical. If
TRUE(default), plot the random targeting baseline.- compare_oracle
Logical. If
FALSE(default), do not plot an oracle curve (true CATEs rarely available).- n_bins
Integer. Number of bins for the curve. Default
100.- conf_level
Numeric. Confidence level for bootstrap CI on AUUC. Default
0.95.- boot_reps
Integer. Bootstrap replicates for AUUC CI. Default
500.- seed
Integer. Random seed. Default
42.
Value
A list with:
- auuc
Numeric. Area under the Qini curve (normalized 0-1).
- auuc_ci
Numeric vector of length 2. Bootstrap confidence interval for AUUC.
- qini_df
Data frame with columns
fraction,uplift.- plot
ggplot2 Qini curve plot.
Details
The Qini curve plots the fraction of treated units (ranked by estimated CATE, highest first) against the cumulative incremental outcome (uplift). The AUUC normalizes this to a value between 0 and 1, relative to the perfect oracle. Values above 0.5 indicate better-than-random targeting.
References
Radcliffe, N. J. (2007). Using control groups to target on predicted lift: Building and assessing uplift models. Direct Marketing Analytics Journal, 1(3), 14-21.
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2017). The econometrics of randomized experiments. In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments (Vol. 1, pp. 73-140). North-Holland.